![]() just the taxiing is a bit off (sensitive) compared to the real thing. The C172, for example, qua flight model feels almost as good as the real thing (I have flown a real C172 before). Carenado is offering some aircraft (their P3D aircraft were not exactly study level, but pretty good), and I suspect (but don't take my word for it, because I have not bought it) that given the environment on its own already being a lot more realistic than P3D in terms of winds, air pressure, and weather effects on aircraft could possibly rival A2A on FSX or P3D. That said, there are no A2A level GA aircraft available yet (at least that I know of). While similar in configuration to the Cherokee, the Cherokee Six differed in a number of major areas. Alternatively there is also the Cirrus SR22. The PA-32 series began life as the Cherokee Six, a significantly modified six seat development of the PA-28 Cherokee series. And if you like a low wing, you can try the Beech Bonanza (that one is also a bit more complex as you need to control prop and it is also retractable gear.). The much-awaited A2A Simulations Piper Cherokee 180 for Flight Simulator X This aircraft was an instant-buy for me (just like many of the A2A products) and it must be seen and flown to be. So thats the only plane I can fly at the momentThere are several planes that have none these credentials. So if you add tailwind+experimental+acobatic+glass ![]() I dont like tailwind planes or experimental, nor acrobatic double wing. Agree that a hydro floating would be interesting. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |